Best number on this game is Q1 ML away, +4.4 against the sharp line.
The model has Seattle Seahawks ahead at the end of the quarter 42% of the time, Chicago Bears 37%, and the quarter level 22%, with 9.5 pts projected. Seattle Seahawks gets on the board 68% of the time and Chicago Bears 66%; the opening drive ends in points 42% of the time and someone scores in the quarter 92% of it. All four are context only: back-testing found no edge on any of them, so none carries a pick.
The four numbers we publish for every game
The full game: winner, margin and total
The model has Chicago Bears winning 39% of the time, +1.2 better than the sharp line’s +155 implies. We project Seattle Seahawks by 3.5 pts against a posted SEA -3.5, close enough to the line that we name no side. 46.7 pts projected in total against a posted 46.5: we like the over, +0.6.
How the first points get on the board
- Touchdown opens the scoring55%
- Field goal first36%
- Safety / defensive score0%
- No points at all in the 1st quarter9%
How the price has moved since we published
Every market we price, next to the book
| Market | Sharp line | Our odds | We like | Edge | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 markets | |||||
| 1st quarter moneyline model SEA 42% / tie 22% / CHI 37% | (+129) | +115 | CHI | +4.4 | Wager |
| 1st quarter total we project 9.5 pts | 9.5 (-114) | +101 | Under 9.5 | -1.4 | — |
| 1st quarter margin we project SEA by 0.5 | -0.5 (+109) | — | no bet | — | — |
| Opening drive ends in a score context only - no edge, no pick, no book market | — | — | no bet | — | unpriced |
| Someone scores in the 1st quarter context only - no edge, no pick, no book market | — | — | no bet | — | unpriced |
| Full-game markets | |||||
| Moneyline model SEA 61% | (+155) | +155 | CHI | +1.2 | — |
| Spread model SEA -3.5 | -3.5 (+107) | — | no bet | — | — |
| Game total model 46.7 pts | 46.5 (-108) | -102 | Over 46.5 | +0.6 | — |